<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nat Hentoff Wrong on Rights? Say It Ain&#8217;t So!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/11/nat-hentoff-wrong-on-rights-say-it-aint-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/11/nat-hentoff-wrong-on-rights-say-it-aint-so/</link>
	<description>Irreverent and insightful observations on criminal law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin gugino</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/11/nat-hentoff-wrong-on-rights-say-it-aint-so/comment-page-1/#comment-37306</link>
		<dc:creator>martin gugino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/11/nat-hentoff-wrong-on-rights-say-it-aint-so/#comment-37306</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;Off campus, America simply is not a place where the ASBO could exist. &quot;, which confuses me. I thought that the second clause of the first amendment, which I take to mean the freedom to discuss by sound or symbol (symbol = the alphabet, mostly), was about the same as Academic Freedom for the whole country, as far as the government was concerned. Others, of course, could try to repress dissent.    
But you start the sentence with &quot;Off campus&quot;, as if on campus, one needs to be politically correct, and so Academic Freedom is not a good model for the first amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;Off campus, America simply is not a place where the ASBO could exist. &#8220;, which confuses me. I thought that the second clause of the first amendment, which I take to mean the freedom to discuss by sound or symbol (symbol = the alphabet, mostly), was about the same as Academic Freedom for the whole country, as far as the government was concerned. Others, of course, could try to repress dissent.<br />
But you start the sentence with &#8220;Off campus&#8221;, as if on campus, one needs to be politically correct, and so Academic Freedom is not a good model for the first amendment.<br />
<span class="cluv">martin gugino recently posted..<a class="36f68284f0 37306" rel="nofollow" href="http://timeplaceandmanner.blogspot.com/2011/12/free-discussion-of-geovernmental.html">The free discussion of governmental affairs</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip u 37306" alt="My Profile" style="border:0" width="16" height="14" src="http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

