<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Criminal Justice System is Not a Counterterrorism Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/07/the-criminal-justice-system-is-not-a-counterterrorism-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2010/01/07/the-criminal-justice-system-is-not-a-counterterrorism-tool/</link>
	<description>Irreverent and insightful observations on criminal law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrorism and the Courts: Kennedy Misses the Point - The Criminal Lawyer - Commentary on Law and Policy</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2010/01/07/the-criminal-justice-system-is-not-a-counterterrorism-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-5151</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrorism and the Courts: Kennedy Misses the Point - The Criminal Lawyer - Commentary on Law and Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/?p=349#comment-5151</guid>
		<description>[...] As we&#8217;ve mentioned before, most terrorism is an act of war, not a home-grown crime.  Criminal procedure and warfare are two entirely different things.  The courts, criminal law and law enforcement are not in the business of proactively preventing violence from taking place; they only react, after the fact.  Law enforcement tracks down whodunit.  The law prescribes the rules that law enforcement must follow, and protects the rights of individuals who are suspected or charged with crimes.  It makes no sense to constrain the gathering of military intelligence and the carrying out of warfare by making it comply with the rules designed to protect the rights of criminal defendants.  It makes no sense to get the courts involved in the first place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we&#8217;ve mentioned before, most terrorism is an act of war, not a home-grown crime.  Criminal procedure and warfare are two entirely different things.  The courts, criminal law and law enforcement are not in the business of proactively preventing violence from taking place; they only react, after the fact.  Law enforcement tracks down whodunit.  The law prescribes the rules that law enforcement must follow, and protects the rights of individuals who are suspected or charged with crimes.  It makes no sense to constrain the gathering of military intelligence and the carrying out of warfare by making it comply with the rules designed to protect the rights of criminal defendants.  It makes no sense to get the courts involved in the first place. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Guenier</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2010/01/07/the-criminal-justice-system-is-not-a-counterterrorism-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-5120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Guenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/?p=349#comment-5120</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I was so ready to disagree with you.  But I&#039;m almost convinced, though where do you draw the line between crimes the courts can deal with and those they can&#039;t? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I was so ready to disagree with you.  But I&#8217;m almost convinced, though where do you draw the line between crimes the courts can deal with and those they can&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2010/01/07/the-criminal-justice-system-is-not-a-counterterrorism-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/?p=349#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>The Federalist Society will be hosting a debate on this issue on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at Fordham Law.  Here&#039;s a link for more information: http://www.fed-soc.org/events/eventID.2036/event_detail.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federalist Society will be hosting a debate on this issue on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at Fordham Law.  Here&#8217;s a link for more information: <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/events/eventID.2036/event_detail.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.fed-soc.org/events/eventID.2036/event_detail.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

